How do the calorie and fat profiles compare between Cod and Salmon?
Answer
Salmon has significantly more calories predominantly from beneficial omega-3s.
The contrast in nutritional composition between lean and fatty fish is evident when comparing specific examples. A serving of lean Cod might supply roughly 20 grams of protein for only about 90 calories and less than half a gram of fat. Conversely, a fatty fish like Salmon will have a substantially higher caloric load, potentially reaching around 177 calories per three-ounce portion. This caloric difference is largely accounted for by the significant presence of healthy, unsaturated fats, meaning Salmon's calories are predominantly derived from the highly beneficial omega-3 fatty acids, whereas Cod's calories are overwhelmingly from protein.
Related Questions
What percentage of fat by weight defines a fish as lean?Which long-chain omega-3 fatty acids are abundant in fatty fish?What key nutrients does Cod supply besides being a very lean protein?What nutrients do Haddock provide comparable to Cod?Which fish are generally considered lower in mercury for regular consumption?Which larger predatory fish often carry higher mercury loads?What is the effective strategy merging benefits of lean and fatty fish?What are the ideal preparation methods for lean white fish like Cod?How do the calorie and fat profiles compare between Cod and Salmon?Besides protein, what essential micronutrients do many lean white fish provide?