What type of thinking is considered contrary to normal eating because it sets an unsustainable expectation of perfection?
Answer
All or nothing thinking
The concept of 'all or nothing' thinking actively undermines the sustainability required for normal eating habits. This mindset assumes that any deviation or single slip-up invalidates all previous efforts, often leading to an abandonment of positive patterns until a future, arbitrary start date, like the next Monday. Normal eating, conversely, is designed to be resilient. It anticipates real-life occurrences such as travel or unexpected events and builds in the necessary room for deviation without triggering distress or derailing the overall long-term progress toward health, recognizing that perfection is an unrealistic and unnecessary standard.
Related Questions
What proportion of Harvard’s Healthy Eating Plate should vegetables and fruits fill at every meal?What specific category of sugar does the World Health Organization advise limiting in dietary intake recommendations?Approximately how long does it take for the brain to register satiety signals originating from the stomach?What is the core characteristic differentiating a restrictive eating pattern from normal eating consistency?Which food group does the USDA’s MyPlate model include alongside fruits, vegetables, grains, and protein foods?What foundational behavioral tool is utilized when putting away distractions to focus solely on the food during the initial minutes of a meal?What is the daily maximum salt intake recommended for adults according to the National Health Service (NHS) guidelines?What characteristic must the 'what' of eating align with to support health goals, even while maintaining flexibility in the 'how'?What type of thinking is considered contrary to normal eating because it sets an unsustainable expectation of perfection?What practical action, suggested by the Department of Veterans Affairs, helps regulate appetite hormones and prevent later overconsumption?