Which fish is cited as yielding a lower calorie count when comparing a standard 3-ounce serving for the average consumer?
Answer
Arctic char (hovering around 150 calories)
For consumers prioritizing leanness, Arctic char presents a lower caloric intake compared to salmon. A 3-ounce serving of Arctic char typically hovers around 150 calories. In contrast, salmon's calorie count varies depending on the species but can range significantly higher, typically falling between 180 to 250 calories for the same serving size. While both offer high-quality protein (Char at 22g vs. Salmon at 23g per 3 ounces), char is the winner when strictly comparing the total calorie count.
Related Questions
What distinctive visual marker do all Arctic Char species possess on their fins that salmon lack?Which fish typically leads in the concentration of heart-healthy Omega-3 fatty acids per standard serving size?How is the flavor profile and mouthfeel of Arctic Char generally described compared to richer salmon species like King salmon?In which environment does Arctic Char primarily thrive, often being unable to survive where many popular salmon species thrive?What key factor contributes to the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) assigning farmed Arctic Char a “best” eco-rating?Based on US estimates provided, what is the general price differential per pound between farmed Arctic Char and wild-caught Salmon?Due to its textural property, which fish holds up better structurally for preparation methods like skewering for kebabs?If examining spots on these fish during the non-spawning phase, what color are the spots typically found on Arctic Char versus Salmon?Which fish is cited as yielding a lower calorie count when comparing a standard 3-ounce serving for the average consumer?What is the general life cycle pattern described for most Arctic Char populations, in contrast to popular Pacific Salmon?Where does Arctic Char's flavor profile sit relative to Trout and Salmon, as noted by culinary descriptions?