When does purchasing a personal exoskeleton outright potentially become more economical than continuous clinical rental use over several years?
Answer
If the individual requires continuous, long-term use for daily life and accumulates significant machine hours
The decision between purchasing a device versus relying on clinical access involves calculating a break-even point based on expected usage duration. For a patient requiring continuous, long-term use for daily activities, the accumulated cost of renting time on a clinical machine—which is billed based on facility fee schedules—can eventually surpass the total cost of ownership. This crossover point is estimated to occur over several years (e.g., five to seven years lifespan for the unit), particularly if the patient accumulates a high volume of use, such as 150 total hours over three years.
Related Questions
What was the reported historical purchase price benchmark for a ReWalk personal exoskeleton system?What is the estimated additional cost added solely by the mandatory initial training for a personal exoskeleton device?What is the standard outpatient rate range per hour for physical or occupational therapy sessions mentioned in the context of training?How many hours of supervised training are generally mandated before a user is cleared to operate their personal exoskeleton independently?Which device type represents the lower end of the cost spectrum for assistive exoskeletons?What distinction separates powered, full-body robotic exoskeletons from simpler passive supports?What important development regarding Medicare coverage for personal exoskeletons occurred on the East Coast in late 2024?What factors besides the basic engineering contribute to driving up the final price tag for custom exoskeleton systems?What components must personal exoskeleton owners budget for as separate liabilities for long-term ownership?When does purchasing a personal exoskeleton outright potentially become more economical than continuous clinical rental use over several years?