Is sparkling wine better for you than wine?

Published:
Updated:
Is sparkling wine better for you than wine?

The comparison between the health profiles of sparkling wine and traditional still wine often boils down to minute differences in composition and the unique effect of carbonation, rather than vast, sweeping declarations of one being definitively superior to the other. Both beverages, when consumed in moderation, share many of the same potential benefits associated with wine consumption, primarily stemming from compounds like polyphenols. [2][5] However, the process that gives sparkling wine its signature fizz introduces variables—namely sugar levels and carbon dioxide—that warrant a closer look when assessing which might be the "better" choice for a health-conscious drinker. [3][10]

# Production Difference

Is sparkling wine better for you than wine?, Production Difference

The fundamental difference between a glass of Cabernet Sauvignon and a glass of Prosecco or Champagne lies in secondary fermentation. [3] Still wine is generally fermented once, while sparkling wine undergoes a second fermentation, which is necessary to create the carbon dioxide that results in the bubbles. [3] This process is key to understanding why sparkling wines can sometimes appear healthier, even if the base grapes were similar. For instance, some lighter sparkling wines, like certain Proseccos, might have a lower alcohol by volume (ABV) than a full-bodied still red, directly translating to fewer calories per serving. [8]

# Calorie Counts

When calorie counting becomes the deciding factor, the specific style of the sparkling wine matters immensely. [6] A common misconception is that all bubbles equate to a high sugar load, but this isn't always true. Sparkling wines are categorized by residual sugar levels, ranging from Brut Nature (bone dry) to Doux (sweet). [1] A very dry sparkling wine might have fewer calories than a sweet dessert wine or even some oak-aged still whites. [6]

If we look at typical ranges, a five-ounce pour of a standard still red or white wine often falls between 120 and 130 calories, depending heavily on the ABV. [6] Some lighter sparkling wines, particularly those that are lower in alcohol or have less residual sugar, might clock in closer to 90 or 100 calories per serving. [6][8] For someone keeping a close eye on energy intake, opting for a dry sparkling wine over a high-alcohol still wine could save roughly 20 to 30 calories per glass. [6] When considering a typical evening of enjoying a few glasses, this difference, while small per glass, can accumulate. If you consume three five-ounce glasses of sparkling wine at 100 calories each, versus three five-ounce glasses of a 14% ABV red wine at 135 calories each, you’ve saved about 105 calories over the course of the evening just by selecting the style with lower inherent sugar and alcohol content. [6]

# Antioxidant Power

The discussion around the health benefits of wine often centers on the polyphenols and antioxidants present, compounds linked to cardiovascular advantages. [5] Red wine is generally cited as the leader here due to its longer contact time between the grape skins and the juice during fermentation, which extracts higher levels of beneficial compounds like resveratrol. [9]

However, this does not disqualify sparkling wine entirely. Champagne and other sparkling wines, particularly those made from Pinot Noir and Chardonnay, still contain these beneficial compounds. [5][9] A study published in the Canadian Journal of Cardiology suggested that Champagne and white wine might have heart-health benefits similar to those found in red wine, linked to their polyphenol content, though red wine often retains the edge in sheer quantity. [4] The key takeaway is that if you are reaching for a glass of bubbly over an ultra-processed, high-sugar alternative, you are still accessing some of the antioxidant protection that wine offers. [2][4]

# Gas Effect

One area where sparkling wine stands apart is its carbonation, which some research suggests might offer unique benefits. [10] The presence of bubbles has been linked in some preliminary studies to improved circulation and blood flow. [10] While the science here is less established than the polyphenol research, the sensation of drinking something fizzy might also psychologically influence consumption patterns. [1] Some people report feeling fuller faster when drinking sparkling beverages, which could lead to naturally consuming less overall compared to still wine. [1] This perceived satiety is a distinct characteristic that still wine simply cannot replicate. [10]

# Potential Drawbacks

Despite the potential lower-calorie options, sparkling wine carries specific potential downsides that still wine drinkers avoid. The most obvious is the pressure and acidity associated with carbonation. [1] For individuals prone to acid reflux or sensitive stomachs, the added carbonic acid can be irritating. [1][2]

Furthermore, while the bubbles might slow down drinking slightly, the alcohol itself is absorbed quickly, and some research suggests that the rapid ingestion of alcohol, even in smaller quantities, can be detrimental. [2] Another crucial practical point for consumers: you must pay close attention to the sweetness level. [1] While a Brut Nature is dry, many popular sparkling wines are labeled Extra Dry or Sec, which can contain significantly more added sugar than even a moderately priced still wine. [1] This means that selecting Brut or Extra Brut is an actionable step for the health-aware consumer, as the difference in sugar grams between an Extra Dry and a Brut can be substantial enough to negate the calorie advantage gained from lower ABV. [1] It is prudent to look beyond the "sparkling" label and check the sugar content if managing sugar intake is a priority. [1]

# Moderation Matters

Ultimately, the question of which beverage is "better" shifts away from the bottle and onto the pour size and frequency. [2][5] Whether you choose a bold Shiraz or a crisp Cava, the established health consensus remains: moderate consumption is the crucial factor. [5] For most healthy adults, this typically means up to one standard drink per day for women and up to two for men. [2] If the choice is between a single, measured glass of sparkling wine or an excessive amount of still wine, the sparkling option is clearly superior. [2] Conversely, if the choice is between a carefully measured glass of still red wine known for its high antioxidant profile and an overly sweet, high-calorie sparkling wine, the still red might offer more tangible benefits. [5] The experience of enjoying the drink—the slight elevation in mood or social connection that a glass of bubbles can bring—also contributes to overall well-being, provided it stays within responsible limits. [10]

#Videos

A Dietitian Compares Wine Versus Champagne | Well+Good

#Citations

  1. The Pros and Cons of Drinking Sparkling Wine - Glass Of Bubbly
  2. Learning The Pros and Cons of Sparkling Wine - 14 Acres
  3. What's The Difference Between Wine and Sparkling Wine? - Bricco
  4. Sparkling and White Wine Could Protect Against Sudden Cardiac ...
  5. Is Champagne Healthy? Here's What Science Says
  6. How Many Calories in a Glass of Red, White or Sparkling Wine
  7. A Dietitian Compares Wine Versus Champagne | Well+Good
  8. What's Healthier? Beer vs Prosecco Sparkling Wine - SYLTBAR.com
  9. Does champagne have health benefits like red wine? - Quora
  10. 5 Health Benefits of Bubbles

Written by

Steven Roberts
beverageSparkling wineWinealcohol